Oh what a tangled Webb . . .
Posted By Russ Emerson on June 11, 2008 at 2:30 pm
I could have sworn that the Left was all about supporting the troops, but not their mission.
I guess that doesn’t apply if the war has been over for nigh on 140 years, and if the supporter in question is a potential Vice Presidential candidate:
Barack Obama’s vice presidential vetting team will undoubtedly run across some quirky and potentially troublesome issues as it goes about the business of scouring the backgrounds of possible running mates. But it’s unlikely they’ll find one so curious as Virginia Democratic Sen. Jim Webb’s affinity for the cause of the Confederacy.
Webb is no mere student of the Civil War era. He’s an author, too, and he’s left a trail of writings and statements about one of the rawest and most sensitive topics in American history.
He has suggested many times that while the Confederacy is a symbol to many of the racist legacy of slavery and segregation, for others it simply reflects Southern pride. In a June 1990 speech in front of the Confederate Memorial at Arlington National Cemetery, posted on his personal website, he lauded the rebels’ “gallantry,” which he said “is still misunderstood by most Americans.”
I’d say that pretty much kills Webb’s chances for future advancement in the Democrat party, the privileges afforded ex-Klansman Senator Byrd notwithstanding.
The problem, of course, is slavery. While the root cause for which the South fought was indeed states’ rights, the fact that the specific right they were defending was the right to own slaves taints the Confederacy beyond the hope of recovery. Had the casus belli been the right of states to set their own tariffs, we’d be having a different discussion. The Civil War would be a much less “raw and sensitive” topic if the South had acted as suggested by Lt. General James Longstreet in the film Gettysburg
For the sake of argument, can we posit that there is no one (apart from some vanishingly small number of nanocephalic cranks) in this country who believes that chattel slavery is a good idea? That no one, not even Senator Webb, would like to see a restoration of the antebellum South?
Might it then be just possible for the millions of Americans whose ancestors fought for the South to take some degree of pride in the undeniable courage and sacrifice of those ancestors — the overwhelming majority of whom never owned a slave?
My own ancestors were Northerners, or still lived in the Netherlands in the 1860s, so I really don’t have a dog in this fight, but as a student of history, I can recognize gallantry for what it is, or was; a great deal of it sprang from the South in the period 1861-1865.
More at Gateway Pundit, Protein Wisdom, Hot Air.
We are just stopping by to say hi and to thank you once again for helping us to help Moki. We can’t wait until we get the test result back from the MRI and CSF Tap!