Bias? Say It Isn’t So!
Posted By Russ Emerson on March 14, 2005 at 3:56 pm
From Reuters:
Study Shows U.S. Election Coverage Harder on Bush
By Claudia Parsons
NEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. media coverage of last year’s election was three times more likely to be negative toward President Bush than Democratic challenger John Kerry, according to a study released Monday.
Well, duh. I mean, really: duh. It oughtn’t to have taken a study to figure out the negativity was slanted in favor of Kerry — only to quantify it.
Three quarters of the way through the article, however, we come across this gem:
“It may be that the expectations of the press have sunk enough that they will not sink much further. People are not dismayed by disappointments in the press. They expect them,” the authors of the report said. [Emphasis mine.]
A “Quote of the Day” candidate if ever there was one.
(via Drudge)
Nice blog. I just got mine started today. I hope it will look like this someday. Its just hard to keep finding fresh content