The Unbearable Whiteness of Being Barack Obama

Posted By on September 28, 2011 at 8:00 am

[Go ahead, denounce me now.]

So, Obama is having trouble with the Congressional Black Caucus… and, remarkably, with his poll numbers in the African American community.

I thought about it for a while, and it occurs to me that the root cause of these problems may be deceptively simple: despite the color of his skin, Obama has nothing at all in common with 99% of the members of the broader Black American population.

His family and life experiences are totally different from those of any random Black American. He is not the descendant of slaves; his great-grandparents were never threatened by the KKK; his grandmother never had to sit in the back of the bus. He grew up neither in a ghetto nor in the rural South.

Others have written more and better than I could about Obama’s actual history, both in academia and afterwards, but let’s just say that “greasing the skids” seems to have been the hobby of virtually every adult in young Barack’s life, from Frank Marshall Davis to Bill Ayers and beyond.

Having never had to do real work for a living, having gone from one sinecure to the next in the entirety of his adult life, it’s no surprise that he (and the academics with whom he has surrounded himself) has no clue what to do (or the inclination towards doing it) to restore the US economy… and Blacks are suffering disproportionately. It’s no wonder that Obama, having had most everything in life handed to him on a silver platter, is unaccustomed to and unable to deal with his failures as President.

Is it such a stretch, then, to think that Obama — unlike, say, Herman Cain — is utterly out of touch with the sentiment of the Black populace? The truly amazing thing is that despite the decline in his support, he retains as much as he does due solely to the color of his skin.


Update: Well, at least he still has the Communists. So there’s that.

Historical Oddity

Posted By on September 26, 2011 at 8:05 am

I thought I was pretty well informed on most aspects of World War 2 history. No, I am well informed on WW2. So it’s rare that I run across something in my reading that I’d never seen or heard about before.

It’s fairly well known that in the countries it had conquered, Germany recruited soldiers for the “great struggle” against communism as embodied by the USSR. The Waffen SS had units composed of Danes, Belgians, Cossaks, Ukranians, Latvians, et cetera, and so on.

French

Arabs

These units — some countries supplied enough men to form a couple of divisions, but most were never hugely numerous — often served under German officers, and wore German uniforms with nationally distinctive badges and accoutrements.

What I didn’t know — what I never even suspected or heard a word about — was that there was a “British Free Corps” in German service.

Poster

BFC tunic

BFC troops

Recruited from POW camps, and never above platoon strength, the Britisches Freikorps had no effect on the war whatsoever. Courts martial followed war’s end; the chief recruiter (a British turncoat) was convicted of treason and hanged.

While there are many cases known of immigrants returning from America to Germany to fight for their homeland, I have not been able to find anything that indicates any American troops were ever recruited suckered from POW camps into German service against the Soviets.

It does make me wonder, though, what other items of historical interest I might have missed in my years of reading.