Odd Spam

Posted By on November 26, 2003 at 8:24 am

I have, over the past couple days, received the oddest spam.
There is no HTML or other code in the mail – just ordinary plain old text. (I read my mail, both personal and work, with mutt, which is a plain-text mail reader for Unix/Linux – hidden or obfuscated code in mail is readily apparent, and harmless to me.) (Yes, HTML mail is evil. Stop using it.)
There is no actual advertising in the mail. There’s not a sales pitch of any sort whatsoever in it. Here is a verbatim copy of the latest:

Page 39
again. But there are other things besides burglars that are discovered in empty houses where lights are seen moving.”
“You mean coiners,” said Oswald at once. “I wonder what the reward is for setting the police on their track?”
Dicky thought it ought to be something fat, because coiners are always a desperate gang; and the machinery they make the coins with is so heavy and handy for knocking down detectives.
Then it was tea-time, and we went in; and Dora and H.O. had clubbed their money together and bought a melon; quite a big one, and only a little bit squashy at one end. It was very good, and then we washed the seeds and made things with them and with pins and cotton. And nobody said any more about watching the house next door.

Like I said, rather odd. I’m guessing that the body of the mail is an attempt to get past Bayesian filters. But no sales pitch? Weird.
The strangest bit, though, is that the “Subject” line of the mail contains my last name and one of my previous mailing addresses, followed by the only thing that indicates a spammish nature, the phrase “Preemptive Loan Statement.”
I did a whois lookup on the sender’s domain. Yep — big-time spammers.
These spammers are getting to be pretty bizarre. I wonder if I’m paranoid enough. What I’d really like to know is: who sold them my e-mail and snail-mail addresses?
Death’s too good for them all… but I’ll settle for dismemberment if I have to.

In Denial

Posted By on November 25, 2003 at 10:31 am

Describing his book (with John Earl Haynes) In Denial: Historians, Communism, & Espionage:

One of the scandals of American higher education is that there are more than a few academics who are the equivalent of Holocaust deniers — they defend Joseph Stalin, they defend mass murder and they ignore or distort clear historical evidence. And they teach at respected institutions of higher learning where their faculty colleagues politely ignore their views instead of treating them as the moral pariahs they should be.

Harvey Klehr, interviewed by Jaime Glazov.